A Tale of Two Cities - New York and Mumbai - Instablogs
A Tale of Two Cities - New York and Mumbai
Denis , Geneve: Dec 3 2008
Made Popular Dec 4 2008
India :

A Tale of Two Cities - New York and Mumbai

Before the odor of burned gunpowder has left the air of the Taj Mahal Hotel in Mumbai, the US is lecturing India not to go off half-cocked and attack Pakistan, simply because all of the attackers in the terrorist assaults in that city arrived by boat, apparently from neighboring Pakistan. US officials, including Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, are calling on India to engage in a “transparent” and “thorough” investigation into the attacks to establish who was responsible.

How different this is from the American government’s response to the 9-11 attacks in the US!

‘Instead of a “transparent” investigation, we got secret sessions of the Congressional intelligence committees, closed-door interviews of key officials, including President Bush and Vice President Cheney by the 9-11 Commission, and of course the secret round of thousands of mostly Islamic people living in the US, many of whom were held of months incommunicado and without charge, some of whom were subjected to torture, and many other of whom were deported to likely arrest, torture and even death.

Instead of a calm assessment of what had happened and who was responsible, the Bush Administration rounded up Saudi members of the Bin Laden family, and others connected to the regime in Saudi Arabia, whence came most of the people reportedly involved in the hijacking of the four planes used in the attacks, and, with no attempt at interrogation, flew them home to Saudi Arabia.

Then, again with only minimal evidence, the US launched an all-out war within days upon Afghanistan, with the goal of ousting and destroying the Taliban government of that country. Shortly after that aggressive move, the Bush/Cheney administration shifted its focus and launched an even larger all-out war against Iraq, a nation that had no connection whatsoever with the attacks on the Pentagon and the World Trade Center.

So much for transparency and measured responses. Here again, we have an example of the US expecting one mode of behavior for the rest of the world, and another for itself.

Americans, it would appear, are not required to operate in a logical manner, are not required to think through the consequences of actions, are not required to obey international laws, and are not required to listen to the counsel of others. If the United Nations will not support the plan to attack and topple the government of another sovereign nation, they will just do it. But other countries may not behave in this manner.

There is another way that India and the US are different which has come to light in this latest atrocity. Following the Mumbai attacks, India’s minister of security resigned, in an admission that his department had failed to discover an attack that was clearly at least six months in planning, and had failed to prevent the massive loss of life because of inadequate preparation of police and troops for such an eventuality (police and soldiers were not equipped even with sniper rifles and scopes that might have enabled them to shoot and kill some of the 10 terrorists with minimal threat to their hostages).

Nobody resigned for the manifold failings that led up to and allowed for the 9-11 attacks. Nobody resigned for intelligence failures, nobody resigned for air defense failures, nobody resigned for investigative failures, nobody resigned for the lies that were the basis for the attack on Afghanistan and the war against Iraq.

There has indeed been zero accountability in the US for the biggest national security disaster since Pearl Harbor. But in India, it took only days for the chief person responsible for security in the Indian government to resign his post in disgrace.

Let us hope that saner heads prevail in India when it comes to Pakistan, as the story of this latest terror action is exposed.

And let us hope that Americans finally demand an honest accounting of what happened on 9/11/2001 and that those who are guilty of allowing it to happen, and of sending the country off on a pointless, bloody and seemingly endless jihad in the Middle East as a result are exposed and forced to pay for their ineptness and their crimes.

Add Images and Videos
Close X
Recommended Tags or Keywords
Search by Tags or Keywords
Selected Media ( You can Upload only Six media )
Sorry no picture found for this combination of tags. Try to search minimum number of tags at once
3 Stars
Ekta
Jaipur, India
Very intelligent piece Denis. I don't know about the consequences of war neither about the US policies or the Indian policies...but being and Indian citizen i need security. I need my government to take strict actions against people who dared to enter my country and kill my countrymen. I don't want to live in fear. What is the solution to this problem, if not an attack on the terrorists?
1 Stars
Denis
Geneve, Switzerland
Yes, Ekta, we all crave security to the point that we think we need security. What is security for you? Do you think security can be found in the transient, external world?

And what is fear, but False Expectations Appearing Real

Please respond, I’d like to go into this deeply with you.
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Sanwali
Shimla, India
Be it war or terrorist attack, its only the common man who’s the sufferer by the end of the day. Its better to die during the warfare rather than in the attacks by these extremists.
3 Stars
Denis
Geneve, Switzerland
Hello Sanwali, I read your comment as the comment of someone who has not directly experienced war. I have experoence war up close and personal (Vietnam, 1967,1968). I have the scars on my body, as mementos. The body recovers quickly; it takes decades to salvage the mind and spirit. Terrorist want to provoke exactly the sentiments that you are expressing. If you react violently, they have won. Thursday, December 4, 2008, 1:32:56 PM, you wrote: >
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Puneet
Noida, India
India has recently faced lot of terror attacks. This time the matter has turned out to be worst. Terrorists have openly challenged India by attacking the places which are the hub of the creamy layer of the society. Something will be done for sure as people targeted hold importance for the nation and are not amongst the common man who's problems are negligible for our respected leaders.
1 Stars
Denis
Geneve, Switzerland
In 1942, Indians were considered the terrorists in India, by whom?. . .the Brittish!! In the present situation, terrorist have attacked the places most likely to contain large numers of Westerners. Why?... because terrorist activity is designed to deliver a message and provoke a reaction. If you react, they have won.
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Milind
Thiruvananthapuram, India
These terrible incidents keeps on repeating themselves and we keep on boasting about common man’s courage and undying spirit. That’s stupid and absurd. It’s not their undying spirit-it’s their insensitivity-it’s their selfishness-it’s their cowardliness-it’s their desire not to change and not to bring a change-it’s their slavery mindset-it’s their disrespect towards human life. We all-the whole society is responsible for all these terrible things. It’s time to change. And before changing anyone else, we need to change ourselves.
1 Stars
Denis
Geneve, Switzerland
Very astute comment, Milind. We need to disolve this sense of ”otherness”.
(Global Perspectives)
Add your Comment